• Navigate
    • About
    • High-level Definitions
    • Detailed Definitions
    • Applications
  • Download PDF Report
UN Global Compact | Pacific Institute
Mailing List
Publications
  • Corporate Water Disclosure Guidelines (2014)
  • Exploring the Business Case for Sanitation
  • Shared Water Challenges and Interests
  • Understanding "Sufficiency" in Water-Related Collective Action
  • Corporate Water Accounting
  • Guide to Managing Integrity in Water Stewardship Initiatives (2015)
  • Respecting the Human Rights to Water & Sanitation (2015)
  • Guide to Setting Site Water Targets Informed by Catchment Context
  • Guide to Responsible Business Engagement with Water Policy (2010)
  • Understanding Key Water Stewardship Terms
  • Guide to Water-Related Collective Action (2013)
  • Water Resilience Coalition
Tools & Websites
  • Water Action Hub
  • WASH4Work
  • Natural Resources Risk & Action Framework
  • Water Resilience Assessment Framework
  • Benefit Accounting of Nature-Based Solutions for Watersheds
Understanding Key Water Stewardship TermsUnderstanding Key Water Stewardship Terms
  • Navigate
    • About
    • High-level Definitions
    • Detailed Definitions
    • Applications
  • Download PDF Report

About

  • Home
  • About

Participating organizations

Alliance for Water Stewardship, Ceres, CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project), The Nature Conservancy, Pacific Institute, Water Footprint Network, World Resources Institute, and WWF provided expertise and insights, widely support outcomes-to-date, and will seek to incorporate those outcomes into their organizational efforts where possible.

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and PricewaterhouseCoopers offered additional expertise and insights that were essential in the development of this paper.

Acknowledgements

The CEO Water Mandate Secretariat and project team organizations would like thank, Stefan Pfister (ETH – Zürich), Beate Werner (European Environment Agency), Robin Farrington (GIZ), Astrid Michels (GIZ), Sebastien Humbert (Quantis International), Rob Greenwood (Ross Strategic), Maite Aldaya (UN Environment Programme), Llorenç Milá-i-Canals (UN Environment Programme), Marty Matlock (University of Arkansas), Jamie Bartam (University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill), and Josefina Maestu (UN-Water) for their feedback and expertise that were critical in shaping the outcomes and definitions shared in this discussion paper.

Background

As corporate water assessment tools and stewardship initiatives continue to emerge and their underlying approaches and methodologies evolve, there has been a proliferation of sometimes conflicting interpretations and uses of key water-related terms. This is especially true of terms used to indicate geographic locations where water-related challenges are more pronounced, namely “water scarcity”, “water stress”, and “water risk”. In advance of its March 2013 multi-stakeholder working conference in Mumbai, the CEO Water Mandate developed a briefing paper that describes how definitions and interpretations of these terms have evolved over time and how they are currently being used differently by various corporate water tools and initiatives.

In May 2013, the Mandate Secretariat initiated a dialogue among organizations developing corporate water tools and other initiatives to see if a shared understanding could be reached on a number of key definitional issues. While acknowledging that each group uses these terms to varying extents and orients their tools and other products around different objectives, participating organizations agreed that when making use of these terms, doing so in a harmonized and consistent way supports understanding of their products and limits confusion among their audiences. In this spirit, they sought to work toward a mutual understanding on key questions such as:

  • Do “scarcity”, “stress”, and risk” refer to three distinct, useful concepts in the context of corporate water stewardship?
  • What specifically is meant by each term? How do organizations conceive of them differently?
  • How do these terms relate to one another?
  • How can these terms be used in practice? For what purposes may these terms not be appropriate or useful?

This initial dialogue has led to a year-long, iterative endeavor through which participating organizations have attempted to reach shared understanding of these terms, while also identifying areas where there is divergence in understanding. These discussions have focused on developing a conceptual overview of these terms and their relationship to one another, as opposed to quantitative approaches to calculating and measuring these terms. The latter goal was deemed quite difficult due to data and methodological limitations (and perhaps even undesirable). During this process, the Mandate Secretariat and partnering organizations sought feedback on this work within the corporate water stewardship community, as well as more broadly amongst others in the scientific, water resources management, and risk assessment communities and others helping to shape the development of water-related indicators and metrics. This feedback served as the basis for further refinements of these conceptual definitions.

This paper summarizes key outcomes from this process. Alliance for Water Stewardship, Ceres, CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project), The Nature Conservancy, Pacific Institute, Water Footprint Network, World Resources Institute, and WWF provided expertise and insights, widely support outcomes-to-date, and will seek to incorporate them into their organizational efforts where possible. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and PricewaterhouseCoopers offered additional expertise and insights that were essential in the development of this paper. The Pacific Institute – in its role as member of the CEO Water Mandate Secretariat – shepherded these discussions and prepared this paper. The Mandate Secretariat and participating organizations will look to expand upon and further refine these outcomes as needed in the future.

Continue on with this Guide

Table of Contents

  • About
  • High-level Definitions
  • Detailed Definitions
  • Applications
  • Download PDF Report
Newsletter

Common Water Accounting Framework:

A common language for water users

CEO Water Mandate

UN Global Compact | Pacific Institute

ceowatermandate@unglobalcompact.org

About the Mandate

  • Mission & Governance
  • Endorsing Companies
  • Strategic Partners
  • Focus Areas & Working Groups
  • FAQs
  • News

Mandate Resources

  • Water Stewardship Academy
  • Water Stewardship Toolbox
  • Water Action Hub
  • Newsletter
Tweets by H2O_stewards

United Nations | Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Copyright

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Navigate
    • About
    • High-level Definitions
    • Detailed Definitions
    • Applications
  • Download PDF Report