Case Study Overview:
This case study drawn from the CEO Water Mandate’s Understanding “Sufficiency” in Water-Related Collective Action report.
Figure 6 below graphically summarizes the overall water budget of the Colorado River basin in the western US. This water budget was prepared using a variety of published data sources and a river system model developed by the US Bureau of Reclamation. As illustrated here, it is clear that irrigated agriculture accounts for the largest portion of water withdrawals and consumptive uses in this large river basin (637,000 km2). Another important point about this water budget is that all of the available water is fully consumed before the river reaches its delta in Mexico, in virtually every year. The lack of any ‘reserve’ of water left to flow through the delta has severely damaged freshwater and estuary ecosystems, disrupted indigenous cultures dependent on wild plants and animals for sustenance, and created substantial risks for businesses, farmers, and all other water users during years with less-than-average water availability. There is a strong desire to restore some of the water flow through the delta to support ecosystem, economic, and cultural needs locally.
The water budget portrayed in Figure 6 provides important context for understanding the types of water uses that have led to the ecological, social, and economic impacts experienced today in the Colorado River delta. Prepared at the scale of an entire river basin, such a water budget can also provide insight into regional- or national-scale water policies that may need to be reformed, such as changes in water allocation policies (e.g., “use it or lose it” provisions) at state or federal levels that discourage water conservation in agriculture. Water governance adjustments at state or national scales can be powerful drivers for changes in water use throughout a large river basin such as the Colorado, and can thus be quite influential in mobilizing changes in water use that can help realize the attainment of desired conditions within an entire region. For example, the Commonwealth government in Australia in 2012 adopted a basin-wide plan for the Murray-Darling Basin that mandates a 30% reduction in consumptive use of water across that river basin. Private interests, including associations representing an entire water-sector (e.g., the Farm Bureau often represents the water interests of farmers in the US), can contribute to discussions about needed policy changes.
However, many companies will understandably shy away from playing a highly-visible role in largescale water policy changes, and may prefer to focus on more localized engagement where they can participate in a more tangible way. For example, a number of companies recently contributed financially to an effort to help local communities and NGOs to determine how much water flow would need to be restored to the Colorado River delta to regain some semblance of ecological health. Scientists estimated that unmet water needs for environmental support total approximately 124 million cubic meters per year, on average.
Following a review of the local water budget of the delta region, it was determined that the needed return of water to the delta ecosystem could be achieved through on-farm water conservation practices or the purchasing of water rights from farmers, thereby moving water out of the agricultural component of the water budget and into an ecosystem component that does not presently exist in the water budget as illustrated in Figure 6.
A number of companies also contributed to a monetary fund managed by multiple conservation NGOs (the “Colorado River Delta Water Trust”) for the purpose of purchasing water rights to benefit the delta’s ecosystem. In March 2014, the water rights purchased by the Trust were used to create the first “pulse release” of water from upstream reservoirs into the delta. This pulse release provided water to the delta for the first time in decades. This restoration project has been very well-received by local communities, NGOs, and the farming community, and has garnered considerable publicity and recognition for the companies that helped support the project.
19 Similar Case Studies Found:
- Woolworths' Collective Action to Clear Alien Plants in the Breede Catchment (2016)
- OMV's Water Risk Assessment and Management Process (2016)
- Duratex's Water Measuring Tools (2016)
- Diageo's Assessment of Local Regulatory Context (2016)
- Understanding "Sufficiency" | El Bajío Growing Region, Mexico: Overdrafts in the Aquifer Account (2015)
- Working Towards Better Water Management in the Western Cape, South Africa (2015)
- Iberdrola's Operational Improvements and Supplier Engagement (2015)
- Lockheed Martin's Water Use Efficiency Program (2015)
- Metsä Board's Water Use Efficiency Measures (2013)
- Mining Company in Tanzania: Contamination and Supporting Access to Water (2011)
- Oil & Gas Company in Tunisia: Conflict and Divisions within Local Communities (2011)
- Sasol and Lebalelo Water Users Association in South Africa (2011)
- Anglo American's Mitigating Water Risk in Emalahleni, South Africa (2011)
- MolsonCoors & Clear Creek Watershed Forum | Consulting Stakeholders to Frame Watershed Improvement Priorities (2011)
- Suez Environnement's Collaboration with Watershed Stakeholders for Improved Watershed Health (2011)
- Mining Company in India: Access to Water and Gender-related Impacts (2011)
- Lake Naivasha Initiative | Scoping the Right Collective Action Level of Engagement (2009)
- Coca-Cola's Improving Water Quality for the Mesoamerican Reef Catchments (2007)
- Water Stewardship Integrity Risks in the Kadee River Initiative (Fictional) (0)